TOP

Cessna Aircraft Information Manual - 172 Skyhawk

See Options

By Albert from Longwood FL USA on Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Review: [1974 Cessna 172M] This is the best that was available for 1974. When we transferred to a POH format there was an infinite improvement.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 2 Other people found this review helpful.

By Bill from Mitchell IN USA on Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Pros: Perfect reproduction of the original
Cons: Paper seems like it would tear easily.
Review: [1965 Cessna 172F] This is a great copy of the original Owners manual for the 1965 Cessna 172F. I gave it 4 out of 5 start because I would like to have seen it laminated for durability. The paper is standard thickness and seems like it might tear easily. If lamination were made an option, I would gladly pay for the upgrade. They do it for sectionals, why not manuals.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 1 Other people found this review helpful.

By A Customer from fort smith, Ar. on Thursday, August 30, 2007
Review: [1969 Cessna 172K Aircraft Information Manual] Just what I wanted
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 1 Other people found this review helpful.

By Philip from Cosham Portsmouth United Kingdom on Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Pros: Better than borrowing the aircraft copy !
Cons: Be sure to copy the actual aircraft weights and moments.
Review: [2004 & On Cessna 172S NAVIII] This is almost identical to to the OEM POH supplied with the aircraft. The copy I received was Revision 3 - 12 October 2006. The latest edition at my Aero Club is summer 2007. The main difference is that up to 2006 Cessna were using the Bendix/King KAP 140 autopilot. They are now using the integrated Garmin AFCS. Functionality is much the same and Revision 3 actually contains more supplements. Anyway you still need the Garmin POH as well.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 0 Other people found this review helpful.

By Lee from Orange CT USA on Friday, August 20, 2010
Review: [1975 Cessna 172M] Good, concise review.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 0 Other people found this review helpful.

By Steve from Monticello KY USA on Monday, February 02, 2009
Review: 1975 Cessna 172M. Good as a orginal I read 30 years ago.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 0 Other people found this review helpful.

By John from Barnhart MO USA on Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Pros: Convenient Pocket size, I like the additional information contained in the checklist
Cons: Type size might be a bit small for some
Review: [1973 Cessna 172M]. Convenient Pocket size, I like the additional information contained in the checklist.
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 0 Other people found this review helpful.

By John from Galena MO USA on Thursday, May 08, 2014
Review:
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No 0 Other people found this review helpful.

Subscribe to our Specials Newsletter

You will NOT get bombarded with constant email. Generally we only send one email per month and never more than two.
We do not share our mailing list with any other company.
You can remove yourself immediately at any time. Each mailing includes instructions for removal from our list.