Thursday, August 18, 2011
2nd Best Flying Accessory I've Ever Bought
by bk from KAVP 
Pros: lightweight, non obtrusive, good audio alerts
Cons: did pick up traffic at 5 miles out that ATC didn't see - but, better it pick up too many targets, than not enough
Review: Other than adding a portable GPS, Zaon's XRX traffic detector tops everything else I've put into the cockpit. The fact is, your chances of seeing aircraft, whether pointed out to you by ATC or not, are at best, iffy. And the chances of ATC pointing out the traffic, anyway, even if you are on Flight Following, are iffy. You're captive to luck, and ATC having enough time to separate you. Who wants to have to be "lucky" when flying? Not at 4500 feet. Zaon's XRX puts more fun into your flying, because it reduces anxiety. Face it, you're not going to survive a collision. And it's going to be a nasty way to go. So don't risk it. Get the XRX. You're in charge of how you fly the airplane; why not also be in charge of knowing where your traffic and is and what do about it? After all, it's you (and the other pilot) in the end who suffer, and your loved ones, and the house(s) you may crash into, in the event of a midair.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Tuesday, May 31, 2011
A good, but not perfect, back-up for TIS
by A Customer from Shreveport LA USA 
Review: The TIS traffic alert system in my airplane is limited to an approximate radius of 50 nm from ground reporting stations. I purchased the ZAON PCAS XRX to give me traffic alerts when away from TIS coverage. The ZAON does give alerts, but the locations are not always correct. When I can see traffic visually, it is more accurately shown by TIS on the GNS430. The good news is that it really makes me alert; the bad news is that the traffic locations are not always correctly displayed on the Garmin 496.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Monday, March 28, 2011
Situational awareness better than IFR ATC warnings
by John from Sugarloaf Pa. USA 
Pros: Excellent awareness tool.
Cons: No quite perfect - and tie to 696 insists on only 1 range setting.
Review: Although not perfect, the situational awareness this has added to my cockpit is even better than having ATC warnings!! I have it tied to my Garmin 696 and it depicted traffic in real time on that screen. There have been a few times it "missed" traffic, but they were on the fringes of the coverage area. Flying into Raleigh/Durham was interesting, as it just kept yelling traffic... But in the openness of cross country flying, it is akin to having an experienced fight instructor in the right seat.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Sunday, November 07, 2010
Life saver!
by Terry from CA 
Pros: Saved my life
Cons: none at all
Review: I purchased my XRX a few months ago and have found that it points out aircraft I would have never caught on my own, but today it literally saved my life. I was cleared for #2 on final and began my turn on base, but just as I did I got an alert showing 0.6 miles and closing with and alt of +300 feet and descending, and 45 degrees to my right. I quickly looked up and scanned to find a twin on final. By this point my XRX was telling me "Traffic Alert" as I quickly turned right and back onto downwind. Just as I was about to ask tower about it they frantically instructed me to make a right turn and that I was #3 and follow a Cessna 421 on final. Had I not had my XRX I would have definitely hit that twin or at minimum had a close encounter that would have scared the ___ out of me. My hats off to the guys at zaon for helping me bring me down safely. After today I will never fly without my XRX. It also goes to show that just because tower has Radar and is supposed to be watching, mistakes can and do happen, but having my XRX is like having a little angel over my shoulder now.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Monday, June 28, 2010
by A Customer from Mesa AZ USA 
Pros: SIMPLE TO INSTALL AND SET UP
Cons: EXTRA CORDS AND FALSE FLASHES ONCE IN A WHILE
Review: GREAT TO HAVE AN EXTRA SET OF EYES WORKING WITH YOU.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Monday, January 18, 2010
not sure
by Marcel from Marina del Rey CA USA 
Pros: small
Cons: innaccurate
Review: Permanent echo of my plane and targets go all over the place. distances seem wrong and direction also certainly does not work like my G1000 used to
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Works as advertised
by Dan from Reno NV USA 
Pros: Small, unobtrusive, does its task and I like it
Cons: It should ping for transponders, low power output, 3-6 nm. Then it would evolve from a really neat toy to have to indespensible in the GA cockpit.
Review: It was smaller than expected, able to position on glare shield and level with little effort. Initial altitude and heading values were well within limits, required no adjustment. I could track an aircraft in the VFR pattern with me, position and relative altitude appeared correct.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Saturday, October 24, 2009
Back it goes
by Mike B from Montreal Canada 
Pros: don't know, it never turned on
Cons: Very expensive piece of plastic
Review: Its too bad I can't give this thing a zero. Out of the box, I plugged it into my 172. I pressed the power button and except for a wining noise from the unit, and a completely dark screen, nothing happened. I placed a called to the "support" and they told me to send them the unit for repair. I don't know about you guys, but I just shelled out 1600$ for this thing and I want a new one or my money back, so back to the store it goes.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Thursday, July 30, 2009
It SUCKS and I want my money back
by Kenneth from Perris CA USA 
Pros: Great Idea
Cons: Too much money to be so undependable. Only sees half of the planes even in the Los Angeles area, and those jump around in position so much you still don't know where they are!
Review: Too much money to be so undependable. Only sees half of the planes even in the Los Angeles area, and those jump around in position so much you still don't know where they are! Not happy, wish I didn't buy it.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Not perfect but very good!
by Ed from Sugar Grove IL USA 
Pros: Identifies approximately 75%-80% of traffic and gets eyes outside the airplane.
Cons: Does not identify 20%-25% of transponder equipped traffic.
Review: The ZAON PCAS XRX appears to work as advertised. That is to say it detects many transponder equipped airplanes but not all. For some reason there has been, on occasion, times when ATC was calling traffic to me that was clearly inside the detection window and obviously their transponder was being actively interrogated. The XRX did not detect the traffic at all or the detection came after the traffic had already passed. Visual contact was made with the traffic so it was there. I suppose these could be explained by potential "blind spots" in the system due to the local operating environment, that is the mag compass, center post in windshield, etc. Zaon does warn of these items causing problems and does offer suggestions to minimize these. I have done the best I can in my particular aircraft (C337) and suppose I have no choice but to live with the advertised limitations. I am overall quite pleased with the product and would recommend it to anyone. I would rate it an 8/10. It gets my eyes outside the airplane which is a good thing and makes spotting traffic kinda fun.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Zaon for the lone pilot
by Texas Cross Country Flyer from Central Texas 
Pros: Great second pair of eyes for single pilot operations
Cons: Too many wires, too many bozos not using their transponders
Review: I purchased this last year because I have a grass strip on my farm and have lot's of crop dusters flying over and near my property. To compound matters, I live near an Air Force training base and 3 MOAs and I am not too far from an airport service two airlines. (I suspect by now you know this unit reads the other guys transponder and NEEDS that signal in order to work. If not, you need to do some more homework on how the ZAON and other devices like this work... go Google) The ZAON did a good job at finding one bozo who took off from a small rural Texas airport I was about to land at. The bozo, NEVER talked on the radio announcing his intentions and I never saw the guy, but my ZAON did. In fact when it showed up in a graphical representation on my Garmin 496, I was a bit alarmed at first because the bozo was so darned close. I fly alone a lot in my Cessna, and I don't have the luxury of having a second pair of eyes when I fly to help spot traffic. That being said, there are three problems I had with the ZAON. #1. Crop dusters are %#@%s and rarely turn on their transponders, thus the ZAON is rendered useless for this segment of flying bozos. (Crop dusters are also notorious for NOT talking on the radio... you rarely have the faintest idea where these guys are 99% of the time... ) #2. Once the ZAON was placed up on my glareshield, I had a big mess of wires when tapping my headset and intercom into the unit (and another wire going to the cigarette lighter) There is another wire, if you buy the optional data cable to couple your GPS... This made my panel area look like a spaghetti bowl had been dropped. Although the ZAON was velcroed to my glareshield, it kept "yawing" sideways from the weight of the numerous cables. The ZAON needs to stay level on the panel and perpendicular to your wings, or it can give you inaccurate readings of the other aircraft. #3. Although the ZAON has an internal fan, it sure looks like it could overheat in the Texas sun, on top of a black glareshield in an airplane. I wonder how long it will hold up in Texas/Arizona heat? Despite those above mentioned "concerns" it is nice for a lonely pilot to have this as a second pair of eyes. It spotted several airplanes for me, but missed one Cherokee flying underneath me about 600 feet (probably NOT running his transponder...) I never got to see it work with military traffic... never flew close enough to a C-130 to see. I have to admit I used this for three months and gave up trying to get it to "read" crop dusters. It never saw a single aerial applicator, which is why I bought it. For someone living in complex airspace, this can be a great tool.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Extra Set of Eyes
by Steve from Wantagh, NY 
Pros: Plug and Play. We fly various aircraft and the portability is terrfific.
Cons: In some aircraft it is difficult to find the needed level space on top of the instrument panel. Although this can be overcome with a suction cup mounting bracket it interferes with visibility.
Review: We fly patrols and other missions in the Northeast. Generally our missions bring us through low altitude high density traffic areas. The Zaon PCAS-XRS system has given us an increased level of safety and comfort by providing what amounts to be an addtional set of eyes for the crew. Although our crews continuously scan the area, it is comforting that the Zaon unit can see traffic that we can't.
Was this Review Helpful to you?   Yes   No

The transponder on any aircraft within range of the interrogation replies on 1090 MHz with their squawk code (known as Mode A) and altitude code (or Mode C). The altitude information is sent in an encoded format.  Mode S transponders also reply on this same frequency, and encoded within the Mode S transmission is the Mode A (squawk) and Mode C (altitude) information.  XRX will recognize interrogations from TCAS, Skywatch, and any other "active" system, military protocols, and Mode C and Mode S transmissions.