Monday, June 07, 2010
Good Layout. Takes Getting Used To
by A Customer from Phoenix AZ USA 
Pros: Clean, well-organized.
Cons: Coverage area. Price.
Review: For pure VFR flying, it's a nice alternative. If the coverage happens to fit your usual trips, all the better. Not as much coverage as a regular sectional and more expensive. Unless you do a lot of VFR cross-country, I'm not sure it's worth the additional cost.

Monday, September 14, 2009
It is a great idea but poorly executed.
by Vernon from Winslow AZ USA 
Pros: Shows airspace, roads, and airports
Cons: Does not show much of anything else.
Review: Makes a great road map. Contrary to the review by Aviation Consumer, the chart is missing many VFR chart symbols. No perennial water features, streams and ponds missing, poor shading of terrain features, mines, and other details too numerous to mention. I am a CFT/II, and not one person that I have shown the chart to has anything good to say about it. It is a great idea but poorly executed. I have spoken to Jeppeesen and they said they would re insert the perennial water features back into the chart. If lf you use this chart carry a current NACO sectional chart in case the GPS becomes inoperative. Very limited information for serious Pilotage and Dead reckoning navigation.